1.
\nUna dintre cele mai mari pl\u0103ceri ale adev\u0103ratului matematician \u015fi\/sau fizician-matematician, este descoperirea “singularit\u0103\u0163ilor”. Acestea \u00eei provoac\u0103 un fior, a\u015f spune, “orgiastic” (i.e. dionisiac \u015fi nu apolinic). Dionisiacul – \u00een acest caz – \u0163ine de intui\u0163ia matematic\u0103 a stabilirii premiselor (cite\u015fte: axiomelor) unei teorii \u015fi nu de logica apolinic\u0103 a demonstra\u0163iei (cum sus\u0163ine Intui\u0163ionismul [1]). O adev\u0103rat\u0103 rev\u0103rsare de adrenalin\u0103 spre creier – am zice ast\u0103zi – sau o ridicare instantanee a \u015farpelui (energetic) Kundalini din chakra “Muladhara” (care se g\u0103se\u015fte \u00eentre organele sexuale \u015fi anus), p\u00e2n\u0103 \u00een “Sahasrara” (care se afl\u0103 \u00een cre\u015ftet), cum afirm\u0103 Tantrismul.
\n<\/p>\n
\n“Inversarea timpului” \u00een diversele puncte privilegiate (singulare) ale “Spa\u021bio-temporalit\u0103\u021bii” einsteiniene a “Conului de lumin\u0103”, combinat\u0103 cu “descrierea” matematic\u0103 prin “Twistorii” lui Roger Penrouse [2], \u020bn cadrul c\u0103ruia “Timpul” merge spre viitor dar se \u015fi \u00eentoarce \u00een trecut, este un exemplu excelent de “orgasm” al unui fizico-matematician de marc\u0103. <\/p>\n
2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. de Gorun Manolescu (postmodernitate versus postmodernism [XVIII]) 1. Una dintre cele mai mari pl\u0103ceri ale adev\u0103ratului matematician \u015fi\/sau fizician-matematician, este descoperirea “singularit\u0103\u0163ilor”. Acestea \u00eei provoac\u0103 un fior, a\u015f spune, “orgiastic” (i.e. dionisiac \u015fi nu apolinic). Dionisiacul – \u00een acest caz – \u0163ine de intui\u0163ia matematic\u0103 a stabilirii premiselor (cite\u015fte: axiomelor) unei teorii \u015fi nu de […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[315,27,51],"tags":[1132,1117,28,52],"class_list":["post-1139","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-egophobia-23","category-filosofie","category-postmodernitate-vs-postmodernism","tag-egophobia-23","tag-filosofie","tag-gorun-manolescu","tag-postmodernitate-versus-postmodernism"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6DakB-in","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1139","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1139"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1139\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1534,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1139\/revisions\/1534"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1139"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1139"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1139"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\n“Eviden\u0163a”, \u00een cadrul unei demonstra\u0163ii matematice – alt tip de “orgasm” \u00een jurul unei “singularit\u0103\u0163i” – este cel mai greu de “demonstrat”. \u015ei, de fapt, ea nu este, de loc, demonstrabil\u0103. Cu toate c\u0103, \u020bn cadrul unei perfecte, sofisticate \u015fi \u00eendelungi demonstra\u0163ii matematice, te treze\u015fti cu o sintagm\u0103 standard este evident c\u0103\u2026<\/em>, ceea ce marcheaz\u0103 un alt “orgasm” (simultan al matematicianului “pur” emi\u0163\u0103tor \u015fi al matematicianului – tot “pur” – receptor). “Orgasm” care, de fiecare dat\u0103 este altul, inimitabil, unic (ca \u015fi cel ce apare atunci c\u00e2nd sunt g\u0103site axiomele unei teorii). Care se ascunde sub aceia\u015fi formula standard, este evident c\u0103\u2026<\/em>. Apoi, demonstra\u0163ia \u00ee\u015fi reia cursul (monoton), apolinic care se \u00eencheie, invariabil, cu Q.E.D.<\/p>\n
\n“Banalitatea”, \u020bn matematic\u0103, nu are nimic de-a face cu “Eviden\u0163a”. Prima este catalogat\u0103, \u00eentotdeauna, drept “trivial\u0103” (i.e. o “trivialitate” de genul ‘cine este t\u00e2mpit \u015fi nu \u00een\u0163elege, e treaba lui’ – ca sa nu m\u0103 exprim eufemistic).<\/p>\n
\nC\u00e2nd avem de-a face cu un poet-matematician, ca \u00een cazul, de exemplu, al lui Ion Barbu, (dar exemplele se pot \u00eenmul\u0163i: Omar Khayyam, Lewis Caroll \u015fi al\u0163ii), nu apar diferen\u0163e notabile fa\u0163\u0103 de cele expuse anterior. Pentru c\u0103, lu\u00e2nd exemplul lui Ion Barbu, acesta ajunge la “singularitatea singularit\u0103\u0163ilor” de unde toate \u00eencep: un “Big-Bang” cosmico-matematico-poetic. \u015ei din care “\u0163\u00e2\u015fne\u015fte” dimensiunea unui nou univers, \u00een expansiune infinit\u0103, UNIVERSUL POEZIEI: ‘Un g\u00e2nd adus de raze \u015fi curbur\u0103 \/ (Fii aurul. Irecuzabil greu!) \/ Extremele c\u0103m\u0103rilor de bur\u0103 \/ Mirat le \u00eencepea, \u00een Dumnezeu’; sau: ‘Ar trebui un c\u00e2ntec \u00eenc\u0103p\u0103tor, precum \/ Fo\u015fnirea m\u0103t\u0103soas\u0103 a m\u0103rilor cu sare\/ Ori lauda gr\u0103dinii de \u00eengeri, c\u00e2nd r\u0103sare \/ Din coasta b\u0103rb\u0103teasc\u0103 al Evei trunchi de fum.’; sau, \u00eenc\u0103: ‘At\u00e2tea cl\u0103ile de fire st\u00e2ngi! \/ G\u0103si-vor gest \u00eenchis, s\u0103 le rezume, \/ S\u0103 nege, dreapt\u0103, linia ce fr\u00e2ngi: \/ Ochi \u00een virgin triunghi t\u0103iat spre lume?’. Univers al Poeziei din care autorul dispare pur \u015fi simplu. Sau se ascunde ca \u015fi Divinitatea care ESTE dar nu \u015ftim de unde s-o lu\u0103m. Juc\u00e2ndu-se cu noi. \u015eterg\u00e2ndu-\u015fi urmele de pe nisipul de\u015fertului dinaintea Crea\u0163iei. ![](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/i158.photobucket.com\/albums\/t103\/egophobia\/23\/fil23-01.jpg?w=812\")
<\/p>\n
\nAltfel procedeaz\u0103 \u00eens\u0103 un Blaga: ‘Eu nu strivesc corola de minuni a lumii \/ \u015fi nu ucid \/ cu mintea tainele, ce le-nt\u00e2lnesc \/\u2026.\/dar eu, \/ eu cu lumina mea sporesc a lumii tain\u0103\u2026’. El nu mai e nici apolinic \u015fi nici dionisiac. E, pur \u015fi simplu, un sacerdot. Care te conduce, prin harul s\u0103u, p\u00e2n\u0103 \u00een v\u00e2rful tainic al turlei unei biserici \u015fi ACOLO te las\u0103 singur s\u0103 ai REVELA\u0162IA; dac\u0103 e\u015fti \u00een stare; dac\u0103 nu, nu!<\/p>\n
\nAt\u00e2t Barbu c\u00e2t \u015fi Blaga sunt postmoderni (\u015fi nu postmoderni\u015fti) . Adic\u0103, ie\u015find din empiric, pleac\u0103 de la \u201esingularit\u0103\u0163i\u201d aparent subiective \u015fi anticipeaz\u0103 o nou\u0103 integralitate a unei, de asemenea, noi realit\u0103\u0163i \u020bn care tr\u0103im azi \u015fi care ne deconcerteaz\u0103… C\u00e2t despre postmoderni\u015ftii care nu reu\u015fesc s\u0103 dep\u0103\u015fasc\u0103 empiricul, ei nu fac altceva dec\u0203t s\u0103 se \u020bnv\u0203rt\u0103 \u020bn jurul NIMICULUI (sub pretextul unor a\u015fa zise “texte de stare\u201d) \u2026 <\/p>\n
\nDaca \u00een matematica \u015fi fizica “pure” “banalitatea trivial\u0103” devine, prin descifrarea exprimat\u0103 a sub-textului, o “vulgaritate”, \u00eentr-un fel, acela\u015fi lucru se \u00eent\u00e2mpl\u0103 – e adev\u0103rat: cu ni\u015fte excep\u0163ii notabile – \u015fi cu postmoderni\u015ftii. Cu deosebirea c\u0103 aici, de multe, foarte multe ori, de\u0219i se emit “banalit\u0103\u0163i triviale”, se g\u0103sesc suficien\u0163i cititori care r\u0103m\u00e2n cu “gura c\u0103scat\u0103”! Deoarece prea adesea se uit\u0103 c\u0103, \u00een art\u0103, de fapt nu conteaz\u0103 “cum spui” ci “ce spui”. Ca \u00een situa\u0163ia urm\u0103toare.<\/p>\n
\nCic\u0103 \u00eentr-un compartiment de tren cu naveti\u015fti se suie cineva care nu era din ga\u015fca lor. \u0102ia, naveti\u015ftii, \u00eencep s\u0103 spun\u0103 c\u00e2te un num\u0103r. De exemplu, ‘5’ – r\u00e2sete, ’23’ – r\u00e2sete prelungite, ’14’ , r\u00e2sete isterice, etc., etc., etc.. Individul nostru, interzis, (trezindu-se din “interzicere”) \u00eel \u00eentreab\u0103 pe cel de al\u0103turi (care f\u0103cea parte din ga\u015fc\u0103): ‘De ce r\u00e2de lumea c\u00e2nd se spune c\u00e2te o cifr\u0103?’ ‘Pai, noi \u0103\u015ftia, naveti\u015ftii, ne cunoa\u015ftem at\u00e2t de bine \u015fi spunem, \u00een fiecare zi, acelea\u015fi bancuri \u00eenc\u00e2t, ca s\u0103 nu mai lungim vorba, le-am numerotat \u015fi spunem numai num\u0103rul bancului!’. Individul, str\u0103in de ga\u015fc\u0103, bag\u0103 la cap \u015fi se apuc\u0103 \u015fi el s\u0103 se afle-n treab\u0103 spun\u00e2nd: ‘7!’ – pauz\u0103; mai \u00eencearc\u0103 o dat\u0103: ’12!’ – la fel. ‘Asculta dom’le, numerele astea de le-am zis, nu sunt pe lista voastr\u0103 de bancuri?’ ‘Ba da!’ ‘\u015ei atunci, de ce nu r\u00e2de\u0163i?!’ ‘Ei, problema nu e numai s\u0103 spui un banc, ci \u015fi ce sugerezi!’. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"