{"id":12983,"date":"2020-05-19T20:29:47","date_gmt":"2020-05-19T18:29:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/egophobia.ro\/?p=12983"},"modified":"2020-05-19T20:29:47","modified_gmt":"2020-05-19T18:29:47","slug":"status-1-7","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/?p=12983","title":{"rendered":"status 1.7"},"content":{"rendered":"

(ca prin oglind\u0103)<\/span><\/p>\n

de Marius-Iulian Stancu<\/p>\n

ceea ce nu vor s\u0103 \u00een\u021beleag\u0103 corec\u021bii zilelor noastre este c\u0103 rasismul, \u00een esen\u021b\u0103, interpreteaz\u0103 faptele sociale folosindu-se de aceea\u0219i metod\u0103 care st\u0103 la baza oric\u0103rei \u0219tiin\u021be [observa\u021bie, problematizare, ipotez\u0103, experiment]. preocupat\u0103 \u00een permanen\u021b\u0103 de variabile [excep\u021biile de la regul\u0103], ideologia corectitudinii politice re\u021bine din dialectic\u0103 doar antiteza, \u00eenlocuind posibilitatea adev\u0103rului cu morala denun\u021bului. metoda \u0219tiin\u021bific\u0103 va r\u0103m\u00e2ne pentru ea ultimul bastion al discrimin\u0103rii ce refuz\u0103 s\u0103 se supun\u0103 capacit\u0103\u021bii infinitei alegeri [practica refuzului permanent] pe care crede c\u0103 o are acest viermu\u0219 politic care \u0219i-a f\u0103cut din “corectitudine” unicul scop.<\/p>\n

\u00een sens kantian, nicio femeie cu care \u00ee\u021bi dore\u0219ti s\u0103 ai o rela\u021bie nu este frumoas\u0103 [judecat\u0103 de gust asociat\u0103 \u00eentotdeauna cu dezinteresul], ci doar agreabil\u0103. frumoas\u0103 va fi doar cea pe care nu o vei poseda niciodat\u0103. e\u0219ecul amoros nu cap\u0103t\u0103 sens dec\u00e2t \u00een cheie estetic\u0103, precum cele mai importante aspecte ale existen\u021bei umane.<\/p>\n

toate cele \u0219tiute [pentru c\u0103 putem s\u0103 le repet\u0103m, adic\u0103 s\u0103 le povestim], de care ne ata\u0219\u0103m \u0219i pe care o vreme le iubim [peste care arunc\u0103m mai apoi v\u0103lul urii], nu reprezint\u0103 altceva dec\u00e2t sublinierile dintr-o carte uitat\u0103 aproape \u00een \u00eentregime, ne\u00een\u021beleas\u0103 \u00een m\u0103sura \u00een care am sim\u021bit-o ca fiind despre noi, tulburat\u0103 \u0219i \u00eence\u021bo\u0219at\u0103 de acest presupus dialog imaginar. \u00een cele din urm\u0103, c\u00e2nd \u00een sf\u00e2r\u0219it am reu\u0219it s\u0103 \u00eentorcem \u0219i ultima pagin\u0103: nimic. abia acest fapt este cu adev\u0103rat lini\u0219titor.<\/p>\n

spunea \u021bu\u021bea la un moment dat c\u0103 george c\u0103linescu [cel cu istoria literaturii rom\u00e2ne], prin compara\u021bie cu nae ionescu, “n-avea voca\u021bie filosofic\u0103 nici c\u00e2t un m\u0103turator.” cam astea au fost alegerile prin care ne-am tot izbit cu capul, ca na\u021bie, de pragul istoriei, r\u0103t\u0103cind \u00eentr-un ve\u0219nic spa\u021biu mioritic.<\/p>\n

cele mai grave consecin\u021be ale coronavirusului nu sunt \u00een plan economic, ci \u00een cel libidinal.<\/p>\n

re\u00eent\u00e2lnirea dintre ifigenia \u0219i agamemnon potrivit tragediei lui euripide [ifigenia \u00een aulida], poate fi interpretat\u0103 \u0219i \u00een cheia unei erotici aproape incestuoase. d\u00e2ndu-\u0219i seama de lipsa de m\u0103sur\u0103 a dorin\u021bei, fiica \u00eei cere iertare mamei \u0219i fuge \u00een bra\u021bele tat\u0103lui. poate c\u0103 sacrificarea ifigeniei nu vine s\u0103 \u00eemplineasc\u0103 doar o profe\u021bie, ci este \u0219i maniera ritualic\u0103 prin care dorin\u021ba carnal\u0103 se cere expiat\u0103. iat\u0103 de ce cre\u0219tinismul, \u00een lupta pe care o are de purtat cu trupul \u00een trup, va r\u0103m\u00e2ne pentru totdeauna o religie tragic\u0103.<\/p>\n

\u201cvom r\u0103m\u00e2ne pe frontul nev\u0103zut al germaniei spirituale secrete.\u201d [martin heidegger, caietele negre]. aceasta este cheia \u00een care trebuie interpretat\u0103 vigoarea cu care ultimul filosof al europei refuz\u0103 s\u0103 se lepede de aderarea sa la nazism.<\/p>\n

taina \u00eemp\u0103r\u0103\u021biei este una fra\u021bilor: eugen\u00ede spiritual\u0103.<\/p>\n

interpretarea filosofiei \u0219i a misiunii filosofului \u00een cheie sofiologic\u0103 constituie una dintre acele erori lini\u0219titoare la care ader\u0103 cu pl\u0103cere orice neofit. \u00een realitate, orice filosofie adev\u0103rat\u0103 se constituie ca un \u03c3\u03ba\u03ac\u03bd\u03b4\u03b1\u03bb\u03bf\u03bd<\/em>, \u00een sens paulin, cu filosoful ca suspect principal pentru orice crim\u0103 \u00een serie. din aceast\u0103 perspectiv\u0103, hannibal lecter reprezint\u0103 modelul filosofic prin excelen\u021b\u0103. s\u0103 ne aducem aminte de ce spun \u00een aceast\u0103 privin\u021b\u0103 platon \u0219i nietzsche: (i) \u201cf\u0103r\u0103 s\u0103-mi bat capul cu aceste pove\u0219ti, iau de bun tot ce ne \u00eenva\u021b\u0103 tradi\u021bia \u0219i, dup\u0103 cum spuneam, nu pe ele le cercetez, ci pe mine \u00eensumi. sunt oare o s\u0103lb\u0103ticiune mai \u00eenc\u00e2lcit\u0103 \u0219i mai \u00eenchipuit\u0103 dec\u00e2t \u00eenfumuratul typhon? sau sunt o vie\u021buitoare de r\u00e2nd…?\u201d [platon, phaidros<\/em>]; (ii) \u201eun str\u0103in priceput \u00een fizionomii, trec\u00e2nd prin atena, i-a spus \u00een fa\u021b\u0103 lui socrate c\u0103 ar fi un monstru. iar socrate a r\u0103spuns doar: \u00abm\u0103 cunoa\u0219te\u021bi, domnul meu!\u00bb\u201d [friedrich nietzsche, amurgul idolilor<\/em>].<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

(ca prin oglind\u0103) de Marius-Iulian Stancu ceea ce nu vor s\u0103 \u00een\u021beleag\u0103 corec\u021bii zilelor noastre este c\u0103 rasismul, \u00een esen\u021b\u0103, interpreteaz\u0103 faptele sociale folosindu-se de aceea\u0219i metod\u0103 care st\u0103 la baza oric\u0103rei \u0219tiin\u021be [observa\u021bie, problematizare, ipotez\u0103, experiment]. preocupat\u0103 \u00een permanen\u021b\u0103 de variabile [excep\u021biile de la regul\u0103], ideologia corectitudinii politice re\u021bine din dialectic\u0103 doar antiteza, \u00eenlocuind […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[48,1420,27],"tags":[30,1421,1117,60],"class_list":["post-12983","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ca-prin-oglind","category-egophobia-63","category-filosofie","tag-ca-prin-oglinda","tag-egophobia-63","tag-filosofie","tag-marius-iulian-stancu"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6DakB-3np","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12983","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=12983"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12983\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12984,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12983\/revisions\/12984"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=12983"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=12983"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=12983"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}