{"id":14479,"date":"2022-12-02T18:47:06","date_gmt":"2022-12-02T16:47:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/?p=14479"},"modified":"2022-12-02T18:47:06","modified_gmt":"2022-12-02T16:47:06","slug":"status-2-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/?p=14479","title":{"rendered":"status 2.3"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: center;\" align=\"justify\"><span style=\"color: green;\">(ca prin oglind\u0103)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\">de Marius-Iulian Stancu<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">orice filosofie politic\u0103 trebuie judecat\u0103, deci \u00een\u021beleas\u0103 \u0219i criticat\u0103, dinspre extreme. doar \u00een acest fel hermeneutica poate c\u0103p\u0103ta necesara limpezime de suprafa\u021b\u0103. principalul adversar al oric\u0103rei filosofii politice \u00eel constituie sinele. ceea ce face totu\u0219i diferen\u021ba \u00eentre st\u00e2nga \u0219i dreapta politic\u0103, \u00een favoarea celei din urm\u0103, este c\u0103 prin intermediul unui consum ideologic de dreapta \u00een doze corecte [interiorizare], cu tot ce comport\u0103 ea \u2013 simboluri ale transcenden\u021bei [ierarhie], orientarea \u00een func\u021bie de valori \u00absuperioare\u00bb [care nu mai sunt doar economice ori strict utilitariste], precum \u0219i ceea ce <em>julius evola <\/em>numea drept \u00abautarhie\u00bb, ca \u00a0o austeritate viril\u0103, \u00eenso\u021bit\u0103 de o disciplin\u0103 interioar\u0103, opus\u0103 gusturilor \u0219i comportamentelor burgheze \u2013 toate constituie ingrediente menite a facilita o <em>asumare-de-sine<\/em>, care nu poate avea loc dec\u00e2t \u00een afara politicului, adic\u0103 \u00een eros \u0219i moarte cum bine ne-a \u00eenv\u0103\u021bat <em>socrate <\/em>\u2013 corup\u0103torul tinerilor. <!--more--><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">ceea ce atrage aten\u021bia asupra unui filosof, ceea ce face remarcabil\u0103 \u00eent\u00e2lnirea cu el, este disconfortul ini\u021bial [ca preludiu necesar pentru tot ce mai apoi devine pl\u0103cere] pe care ni-l provoac\u0103. \u00eentr-o epoc\u0103 \u00een care totul trebuie s\u0103 fie spectaculos, <em>heidegger<\/em> ne invit\u0103 s\u0103 redescoperim <em>plictiseala<\/em> ca dispozi\u021bie afectiv\u0103 fundamental\u0103 a filosof\u0103rii, ca un \u00absim\u021b al timpului\u00bb care \u00abne conduce c\u0103tre problema timpului&#8230;c\u0103tre \u00een\u021belegerea modului \u00een care vibreaz\u0103 timpul \u00een temeiul <em>dasein<\/em>-ului&#8230;\u00bb [<em>conceptele fundamentale ale metafizicii<\/em>].<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00eentr-o er\u0103 \u00een care, potrivit remarcilor unui <em>pascal bruckner<\/em>, am trecut de la dreptul de a fi fericit la fericirea ca imperativ, ca nou\u0103 ordine moral\u0103 [a celor vinova\u021bi c\u0103 nu sunt bine, deci depresivi \u2013 \u201ccondamna\u021bii bucuriei, v\u00e2sla\u0219ii de pe galera pl\u0103cerii&#8230;\u201d \u2013 <em>euforia perpetu\u0103<\/em>], avem nevoie de <em>proust <\/em>s\u0103 ne reaminteasc\u0103 lec\u021bia fericirii venit\u0103 prea t\u00e2rziu, care\u00a0 \u00abne este d\u0103ruit\u0103 doar c\u00e2nd am devenit indiferen\u021bi fa\u021b\u0103 de ea\u00bb, o fericire \u00een form\u0103 literar\u0103, estetic\u0103, av\u00e2nd contururile anamnezei [clinice?], \u00een c\u0103utarea timpului pierdut ca [unic] proiect [posibil] al unei fericiri nefericite. iat\u0103 de ce e bine \u00eentotdeauna s\u0103 preferi \u00abodihnitoarea dulcea\u021b\u0103 a unei uit\u0103ri anticipate\u2026ea sl\u0103be\u0219te, \u00eenainte de a o vindeca, ideea fix\u0103 care este orice iubire.\u00bb [<em>la umbra fetelor \u00een floare<\/em>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">#<em>\u03b5\u1f50\u03b4\u03b1\u03b9\u03bc\u03bf\u03bd\u03af\u03b1<\/em>: nu exist\u0103 dec\u00e2t grade ale nefericirii.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00een <em>svet\u0101\u015bvatara upani\u1e63ad <\/em>ne afl\u0103m pu\u0219i \u00een fa\u021ba \u00eentreb\u0103rii fundamentale: \u00abcondu\u0219i de c\u0103tre cine ne stabilim noi \u00een pl\u0103cere sau \u00een ceea ce este diferit de ea?\u00bb aceea\u0219i \u00eentrebare tematizat\u0103 \u0219i de <em>freud<\/em> \u00een \u00abdincolo de principiul pl\u0103cerii\u00bb. eterna problem\u0103 a transcendentalului, cum remarca <em>deleuze<\/em>, ca <em>autoritate<\/em> care determin\u0103 via\u021ba psihic\u0103 s\u0103 se supun\u0103 acestui principiu; \u201cacel <em>ceva<\/em> pe care principiul pl\u0103cerii nu \u00eel poate explica \u0219i care se afl\u0103 \u00een mod necesar \u00een afara sa&#8230;\u201d [<em>coldness and cruelty<\/em>] \u2013 reziduul, aproape nimicul.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;cine e\u0219ti?&#8221; iat\u0103 o \u00eentrebare la care voi r\u0103spunde p\u00e2n\u0103 la sf\u00e2r\u0219it: &#8220;aproape nimic.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">pentru cei afla\u021bi \u00een c\u0103utarea unui breviar de moral\u0103, un cont pe <em>tinder<\/em> este suficient.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">cine [vreau s\u0103] zic[\u0103] oamenii c\u0103 sunt [post-scriptum]: eroarea fundamental\u0103 [din via\u021ba lor].<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">pentru <em>phaidros<\/em> [a\u0219a cum se spune pe sine \u00een <em>banchetul<\/em> lui <em>platon<\/em>] eroticul este eroic.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">erosul ocup\u0103 un loc esen\u021bial \u00een existen\u021ba omului deoarece se aseam\u0103n\u0103 cel mai mult vie\u021bii [este via\u021ba \u00eens\u0103\u0219i?]. <em>leo strauss<\/em>, \u00een comentariul s\u0103u la <em>banchetul <\/em>remarca faptul c\u0103 \u201c<em>aristodem<\/em> este cel mai discret dintre participan\u021bi. el nu spune nimic. are rezervat undeva un loc special, cum vom putea vedea ceva mai t\u00e2rziu. persoana \u0219i aspectul acestuia nu se disting prin nimic. <em>aristodem<\/em> reprezint\u0103 \u00eentr-un anumit sens imaginea adev\u0103rat\u0103 a erosului. erosul nu este str\u0103lucitor. erosul este o fiin\u021b\u0103 aflat\u0103 \u00een c\u0103utare \u2013 nevoia\u0219\u0103.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">magistrul nu trebuie s\u0103 fie bun, ci doar un r\u0103u esen\u021bial.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00een <em>banchetul<\/em> lui <em>platon<\/em>, un <em>socrate<\/em> \u00eemb\u0103iat \u0219i \u00eenc\u0103l\u021bat cu sandale afirm\u0103: \u00abde aceea m-am f\u0103cut frumos, ca s\u0103 m\u0103 duc frumos la om frumos.\u00bb [174a]. contrar atitudinii magistrului, majoritatea [feminin\u0103 mai ales] practic\u0103 o estetizare de sine lipsit\u0103 de obiect, frumuse\u021bea ei nu se reflect\u0103 \u00een nimic, nu face contact, nu ajunge la adev\u0103r [\u00een absen\u021ba dialecticii], \u00een atmosfera astfel creat\u0103 via\u021ba nu poate s\u0103 apar\u0103. orice \u00eencercare de a-i devia corpul de pe traiectoria solitar\u0103 \u00eei st\u00e2rne\u0219te retorica moralizatoare, de\u0219i <em>dante<\/em> afirm\u0103 clar: to\u021bi \u00eendr\u0103gosti\u021bii ajung \u00een iad [\u00een al doilea cerc], pe t\u0103r\u00e2mul umbrelor \u00abscoase de dragoste din lumea vie\u00bb [<em>infernul<\/em> V, 69]. cine nu vrea \u00abs\u0103 ard\u0103\u2026bine este s\u0103 se c\u0103s\u0103toreasc\u0103\u00bb [<em>1 corinteni<\/em>, 7, 9], s\u0103 experimenteze un alt fel de foc, cum interpreteaz\u0103 textul paulin <em>alain de libera<\/em>, cel al cotidianului, al nego\u021bului sexual matrimonial, ca \u00abalternativ\u0103 sexual\u0103 la legea dorin\u021bei\u00bb.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">aproape eroic \u00een ambi\u021bia de a-\u0219i expune alteritatea dincolo de limitele s\u0103n\u0103t\u0103\u021bii mintale, <em>titane<\/em> [<em>julia ducournau<\/em>, 2021], precum tot ce-i uman, nu este f\u0103r\u0103 precedent. <em>david cronenberg<\/em> \u00eemi pare o referin\u021b\u0103 inevitabil\u0103: atrac\u021bia pentru ma\u0219inal \u00een materie de erotic\u0103 [<em>crash<\/em>, 1996] \u0219i muta\u021biile somatice pe care tipul acesta de rela\u021bie le implic\u0103, prin care post-umanul poate s\u0103[-i] ia [din] fiin\u021b\u0103 [<em>crimes of the future<\/em>] sunt pl\u0103ceri explorate \u0219i de <em>julia ducournau<\/em>, doar c\u0103 mai violent [nota 8].<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">#extremism: dac\u0103 nu dau \u00eenapoi, dac\u0103 sunt categoric, dac\u0103 m\u0103 \u00eenf\u0103\u021bi\u0219ez ca fiind mai de dorit, fac toate astea nu \u00eempotrivindu-m\u0103 neadev\u0103rului, inesteticului [pozi\u021bia antitetic\u0103 fiind o iluzie metafizic\u0103 pe ruinele c\u0103reia nu se mai poate construi nimic], ci pentru c\u0103 altfel nu pot s\u0103 \u00eenving.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(ca prin oglind\u0103) de Marius-Iulian Stancu orice filosofie politic\u0103 trebuie judecat\u0103, deci \u00een\u021beleas\u0103 \u0219i criticat\u0103, dinspre extreme. doar \u00een acest fel hermeneutica poate c\u0103p\u0103ta necesara limpezime de suprafa\u021b\u0103. principalul adversar al oric\u0103rei filosofii politice \u00eel constituie sinele. ceea ce face totu\u0219i diferen\u021ba \u00eentre st\u00e2nga \u0219i dreapta politic\u0103, \u00een favoarea celei din urm\u0103, este c\u0103 prin [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[48,1595,27],"tags":[30,1596,1117,60],"class_list":["post-14479","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ca-prin-oglind","category-egophobia-74","category-filosofie","tag-ca-prin-oglinda","tag-egophobia-74","tag-filosofie","tag-marius-iulian-stancu"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6DakB-3Lx","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14479","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=14479"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14479\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14480,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14479\/revisions\/14480"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=14479"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=14479"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=14479"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}