{"id":4262,"date":"2010-03-22T13:08:58","date_gmt":"2010-03-22T11:08:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/egophobia.ro\/?p=4262"},"modified":"2010-03-22T14:52:33","modified_gmt":"2010-03-22T12:52:33","slug":"idealizarea-realului-si-realificarea-idealului-in-bolnavul-ghinionist-ideal-si-norocos-real","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/?p=4262","title":{"rendered":"Idealizarea realului \u015fi realificarea idealului \u00een bolnavul ghinionist ideal \u015fi norocos real"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>[Robert Marius Dinc\u0103 &#8211; <em><a href=\"http:\/\/egophobia.ro\/?p=3788\">Canapeaua<\/a><\/em>, EgoPHobia #26]<\/strong><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #008000;\">(egOPHob)<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=right>de Patrick C\u0103linescu<\/p>\n<p align=justify>\u00a0<br \/>\nAm s\u0103 fac o excep\u0163ie \u015fi am s\u0103 m\u0103 confrunt cu <em>literalul<\/em>. \u00cen cazul de fa\u0163\u0103, al prozei despre care am s\u0103 spun \u00een continuare c\u00e2te ceva, literarul mi se pare a fi f\u0103cut un pas \u00een spate, pentru a r\u0103m\u00e2ne a\u015fa p\u00e2n\u0103 la punctul final al textului \u00een care a devenit secund.<\/p>\n<p align=justify>\n\u00cens\u0103, pentru claritate, nu pot spune nimic despre literalul cu care m\u0103 voi confrunta p\u00e2n\u0103 ce nu reu\u015fesc, \u00eentr-o defini\u0163ie c\u00e2t de c\u00e2t mul\u0163umitoare, s\u0103 zic \u00een primul r\u00e2nd ce este el \u00een felul \u00een care \u00eel \u00een\u0163eleg.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p align=justify>\nEfortul meu teoretic e limitat \u015fi, \u00een aceast\u0103 instan\u0163\u0103, se m\u0103rgine\u015fte numai la urm\u0103toarea observa\u0163ie minimal\u0103: pentru proza de fa\u0163\u0103, literalul trebuie s\u0103 fie dimensiunea documentarist\u0103 a literarului. \u00cen cele mai multe cazuri, care reprezint\u0103 \u015fi majoritatea, literalul nu trebuie s\u0103 aib\u0103 niciodat\u0103 \u00eent\u00e2ietate \u015fi s\u0103 fie, \u00een proz\u0103, mai important dec\u00e2t literarul. Motivul pentru care o astfel de r\u0103sturnare nu poate fi deloc indicat\u0103 e foarte simplu de \u00een\u0163eles: dac\u0103 literarul decade \u00een literal, atunci \u015fi literatura decade \u00een simpla documentare a unui fapt. \u015ei proza, \u00een loc s\u0103 func\u0163ioneze \u00een cheia mimetismului aristotelic, \u00eencepe s\u0103 func\u0163ioneze potrivit unui mimetism mai degrab\u0103 de origine platonician\u0103. \u00cen mare, orice proz\u0103 ce cade din literar \u00een literal cade din literatur\u0103 \u00een documentarism, care, \u00een acest caz, ar putea s\u0103 \u00eenlocuiasc\u0103, par\u0163ial, clasica <em>\u1f31\u03c3\u03c4\u03bf\u03c1\u03af\u03b1<\/em> greac\u0103, \u00eens\u0103 mai degrab\u0103 \u00een sensul latinescului <em>nunc<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p align=justify>\nConfruntarea mea cu literalul, pe care am anun\u0163at-o \u00eenc\u0103 din prima clip\u0103 a acestor r\u00e2nduri, va avea loc <em>\u00een<\/em> excep\u0163ia de la regula \u00eent\u00e2iet\u0103\u0163ii literarului, pe care Robert Marius Dinc\u0103 pare s\u0103 o fi construit \u00een <em>Canapeaua<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p align=justify>\nAfl\u00e2nd despre cump\u0103na lui Vasile, c\u0103ruia \u201eprietenii \u00eei spuneau Sile\u201d, nu po\u0163i dec\u00e2t s\u0103 te \u00eentristezi de necazul omului, dar \u015fi, dup\u0103 numai c\u00e2teva r\u00e2nduri emo\u0163ionante, s\u0103 te \u00eenc\u00e2nte c\u00e2t de simplu \u015fi de u\u015for s-ar fi putut rezolva totul \u00eenc\u0103 de la \u00eenceput. \u00cen aceast\u0103 diferen\u0163\u0103 dintre realul \u015fi idealul nenorocirii lui Vasile st\u0103, cred, \u015fi discrepan\u0163a dintre literar \u015fi literal \u00een mica poveste a lui Robert Marius Dinc\u0103, iar confruntarea mea prezent\u0103 cu literalul, care a f\u0103cut un pas decisiv \u00een fa\u0163a literarului, const\u0103 de fapt \u00een a m\u0103 \u00eentreba de ce autorul acestei povestiri a ales, \u00eentr-un mod pe care \u00eel consider destul de subtil, s\u0103 \u00eenlocuiasc\u0103 realul \u015fi idealul unei nenorociri personale prin inversarea ierarhiei obi\u015fnuite a celor dou\u0103 moduri de reprezentare. Fiindc\u0103, dac\u0103 realul nenorocirii lui Vasile st\u0103 \u00een rezolvarea sa tardiv\u0103, \u00eens\u0103 salvatoare, iar idealul necazului lui Sile const\u0103 \u00eentr-un mod de solu\u0163ionare a problemei ratat chiar din start, atunci, \u00eentr-adev\u0103r, idealul ce ar fi trebuit s\u0103 r\u0103m\u00e2n\u0103 ideal a devenit real, iar realul ce ar fi trebuit s\u0103 r\u0103m\u00e2n\u0103 real a devenit ideal. Cu alte cuvinte, genunchiul drept al lui Vasile, care ar fi trebuit tratat \u2013 \u00een ambele sensuri ale termenului \u2013 la modul ideal, adic\u0103 \u00eenc\u0103 din prima clip\u0103, a fost tratat, cu succes deplin at\u00e2t medical, c\u00e2t \u015fi etic, abia c\u00e2nd idealul ratat s-a dat \u00eenapoi l\u0103s\u00e2nd \u00een fa\u0163\u0103 un real mai pu\u0163in str\u0103lucitor din punct de vedere moral, \u00eens\u0103, practic, foarte eficient.<\/p>\n<p align=justify>\nBine\u00een\u0163eles c\u0103 asocierea, deja sub\u00een\u0163eles\u0103, a literalului cu realul \u015fi a literarului cu idealul \u2013 fiecare termen cu exact sensul atribuit \u00een mijlocul acestei confrunt\u0103ri \u2013 este, \u00een alte condi\u0163ii \u015fi \u00een alte contexte, arbitrar\u0103 \u015fi, probabil, chiar nefunc\u0163ional\u0103. \u00cen <em>Canapeaua<\/em>, \u00eens\u0103, ea nu este doar teoretic func\u0163ional\u0103, ci e \u015fi accentuat\u0103 de un <em>deux ex machina<\/em> inanimat, a c\u0103rui prezen\u0163\u0103 \u201e\u00een spital\u201d, unde \u201eateriz\u0103\u201d, pare s\u0103 fie discret\u0103 \u015fi anonim\u0103 pentru cine nu se pricepe, f\u0103r\u0103 s\u0103 \u015fi fie a\u015fa. Canapeaua \u201edin piele fin\u0103 de un alb imaculat\u201d \u00eenregistreaz\u0103 tot ce li se \u00eent\u00e2mpl\u0103 \u201ecelor ce-\u015fi \u00eenfigeau popone\u0163ul \u00een pielea ei\u201d, dar, la modul ideal, \u201edac\u0103 ar fi fost posibil\u201d, ea \u201ear fi f\u0103cut o triere preventiv\u0103\u201d \u015fi nu s-ar fi ocupat dec\u00e2t de cine \u00eei merita aten\u0163ia.<\/p>\n<p align=justify>\n\u00cenc\u0103 o dat\u0103, realul, \u015fi nu cel mimetic, trece, sub masca literalului, \u00een fa\u0163a idealului demascat de literar, c\u0103ruia \u00eei \u00eenlocuie\u015fte adev\u0103rata pozi\u0163ie \u00een ierarhia modurilor de reprezentare \u00een care, ambii, co-exist\u0103. \u00cenc\u0103 o dat\u0103, a\u015f putea spune, l\u0103s\u00e2nd \u00een urm\u0103 literatura, documentarismul de circumstan\u0163\u0103 idealizeaz\u0103 realul \u015fi realific\u0103 idealul \u00eentr-un joc invers \u00een a c\u0103rui capcan\u0103, aparent a\u015fezat\u0103 sub forma nevinovat\u0103 a unei povestiri despre realit\u0103\u0163ile dez-idealizate din sistemul sanitar autohton, poate s\u0103 cad\u0103 oricine, inclusiv Vasile, bolnavul ghinionist ideal \u015fi norocos real.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[Robert Marius Dinc\u0103 &#8211; Canapeaua, EgoPHobia #26] (egOPHob) de Patrick C\u0103linescu \u00a0 Am s\u0103 fac o excep\u0163ie \u015fi am s\u0103 m\u0103 confrunt cu literalul. \u00cen cazul de fa\u0163\u0103, al prozei despre care am s\u0103 spun \u00een continuare c\u00e2te ceva, literarul mi se pare a fi f\u0103cut un pas \u00een spate, pentru a r\u0103m\u00e2ne a\u015fa p\u00e2n\u0103 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,384,507],"tags":[1113,1133,1147,4,67],"class_list":["post-4262","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-critica","category-egophob","category-egophobia-26","tag-critica","tag-egophob","tag-egophobia-26","tag-patrick-calinescu","tag-robert-marius-dinca"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6DakB-16K","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4262","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4262"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4262\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4266,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4262\/revisions\/4266"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4262"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4262"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4262"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}