{"id":5390,"date":"2010-09-18T16:22:33","date_gmt":"2010-09-18T14:22:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/egophobia.ro\/?p=5390"},"modified":"2011-02-05T21:36:56","modified_gmt":"2011-02-05T19:36:56","slug":"chuck-palahniuk-2-sufocare","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/?p=5390","title":{"rendered":"Chuck Palahniuk [2] – Sufocare<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"

de Marius-Iulian Stancu<\/p>\n

(ca prin oglind\u0103)<\/font><\/p>\n

\nDac\u0103 \u00een Fight Club<\/em> absen\u0163a Tat\u0103lui constituie fundamentul pentru apari\u0163ia \u201cgeam\u0103nului\u201d fantasmatic \u2013 Tyler, construc\u0163ie paranoic\u0103 menit\u0103 s\u0103 mascheze distrugerea universului simbolic, \u00een Sufocare<\/em> absen\u0163a figurii paterne d\u0103 na\u015ftere fic\u0163iunii supreme \u2013 fic<\/em>\u0163<\/em>iunea Fiului<\/em> (\u201cBinecuv\u00e2ntata \u015fi perfecta \u00eentruchipare muritoare a Domnului\u201d). Inc\u0103 din primul capitol al romanului lui Palahniuk, din primele paragrafe, \u00een\u0163elegem c\u0103 \u201cb\u0103ie\u0163elul\u201d este condamnat de Mami s\u0103 devin\u0103 Fiul (\u201cimbecilul \u0103sta mic \u00eenc\u0103 se mai \u00eencredea \u00een Mami\u201d). \u201dIn versiunea modern\u0103 a complexului lui Oedip, mama e cea care-l omoar\u0103 pe tat\u0103 \u015fi fuge cu fiul\u201d.<\/p>\n

\nTema ontologiei iconice<\/em> a omului, dezvoltat\u0103 \u00een neopatristic\u0103 (Panayotis Nellas, Omul \u2013 animal \u00eendumnezeit<\/em>), \u00een care umanul este definit drept \u201cchip al Chipului\u201d (Hristos fiind chipul lui Dumnezeu, iar omul chipul lui Hristos), metamorfozat\u0103 \u00een ceea ce Jean Baudrillard diagnostica drept omnipoten<\/em>\u0163<\/em>\u0103 a simulacrului<\/em> (\u00een spatele imaginilor nu se mai ascunde nimic), \u00eentr-o lume \u00een care \u201cadev\u0103rul, referin\u0163a, cauza obiectiv\u0103, au \u00eencetat s\u0103 mai existe\u201d (Simulacra and Simulation<\/em>), ne poate ajuta s\u0103 \u00een\u0163elegem e\u015fecul omului contemporan, \u00eempreun\u0103 cu mi\u015fcarea circular\u0103 a dorin\u0163ei acestuia, ce se reproduce prin intermediul fanteziei: \u201cputem tr\u0103i doar cu ideea unui adev\u0103r modificat\u201d (Jean Baudrillard), alternativa este insuportabil\u0103 (faptul c\u0103 adev\u0103rul nu exist\u0103). In aceasta const\u0103 seduc<\/em>\u0163<\/em>ia imaginilor, <\/em>seduc\u0163ie metafizic\u0103 operativ\u0103 \u00een absen\u0163a sensului, ce se manifest\u0103 printr-o producere \u015fi reproducere sisific\u0103 a unui real ce ne scap\u0103.<\/p>\n

\n\u201cIdeea nu este c\u0103, datorit\u0103 limit\u0103rilor naturii sale muritoare p\u0103c\u0103toase, omul nu poate deveni niciodat\u0103 \u00een \u00eentregime divin, ci c\u0103, datorit\u0103 sc\u00e2nteii divine din el, omul nu poate deveni niciodat\u0103 \u00een \u00eentregime om\u201d (Slavoj Zizek, On belief<\/em>). Pentru existen\u0163a radical secularizat\u0103 \u00eens\u0103, noua \u201creligie\u201d (Mircea Eliade, Sacrul <\/em>\u015f<\/em>i profanul<\/em>), \u201c\u00eentruparea divinului\u201d, se manifest\u0103 ca o \u201caparen\u0163\u0103 pur\u0103 ce nu poate fi fundamentat\u0103 \u00eentr-o proprietate substan\u0163ial\u0103\u201d (On belief<\/em>). Astfel, grani\u0163ele (frumuse\u0163e sublim\u0103 vs spa\u0163iu excremental) devin tot mai greu de trasat, \u00eentr-o dependen\u0163\u0103 universalizat\u0103 ce se define\u015fte raport\u00e2ndu-se la golurile din structur\u0103 permanentizate, vid ce sus\u0163ine fantezia unui loc \u00eenc\u0103rcat de sens ce ne a\u015fteapt\u0103, fantezie operativ\u0103 ce este \u00een permanen\u0163\u0103 reprimat\u0103, exces ce sus\u0163ine orice no\u0163iune de ordine cosmic\u0103 (Slavoj Zizek, The fragile absolute or, Why is the Christian<\/em> legacy worth fighting for?<\/em>).<\/p>\n

\nInstan\u0163\u0103 narativ\u0103, \u015fi personaj principal \u00een acela\u015fi timp \u00een romanul lui Palahniuk, Victor Mancini ne relateaz\u0103 \u201cpovestea complet\u0103 \u015fi nemiloas\u0103 a unei dependen\u0163e\u201d, expresia literar\u0103 a terapiei ce vizeaz\u0103 vindecarea de dependen<\/em>\u0163<\/em>a sexuala<\/em> (etapa nr.4). \u201cIn sexualitate nu este vorba niciodat\u0103 doar despre mine \u015fi partenerul meu, ci trebuie s\u0103 mai fie \u00eentotdeauna un element fantasmatic, un al treilea element imaginar ce face posibil\u0103 pentru mine ac\u0163iunea de a m\u0103 angaja \u00eentr-o rela\u0163ie sexual\u0103\u201d (Slavoj Zizek, The Pervert\u2019s Guide to Cinema<\/em>). Lipsit de suportul<\/em> fantasmatic<\/em>, actul sexual este un act repetitiv, stupid, care \u00een realitate nu se schimb\u0103. Motivul pentru care libido-ul are nevoie de lumea virtual\u0103 a fanteziilor, de acest supliment virtual, este\u00a0\u00a0 n e v o i a\u00a0\u00a0 d e\u00a0\u00a0 i l u z i e\u00a0\u00a0 pe care libido-ul se fundamenteaz\u0103. Intre fic\u0163iunea pe care sexualitatea o pune \u00een scen\u0103 \u015fi fic\u0163iunea literar\u0103, diferen\u0163a nu se dovede\u015fte a fi una esen\u0163ial\u0103 (de aici \u015fi aspectul terapeutic, de etap\u0103 \u00een cadrul procesului de vindecare, al romanului lui Palahniuk).<\/p>\n

\nVezi \u015fi: \u201cterapie prin teatru\u201d.<\/p>\n

\nFic\u0163<\/em>iunea Fiului<\/em>, ca dependen\u0163\u0103 de tip ideal (\u201cMulte mame se am\u0103gesc cu g\u00e2ndul \u0103sta\u2026E at\u00e2t de dus\u0103, \u00eenc\u00e2t e convins\u0103 c\u0103 tu e\u015fti a doua venire a lui Hristos\u201d), \u00ee\u015fi afl\u0103 corespondentul \u00een patologia dependen\u0163ei sexuale, cu \u00eentreaga ei ambivalen\u0163\u0103, \u00een dublul ei registru de fantezie \u015fi act carnal. Ambele tipuri de dependen\u0163\u0103 (ideal\u0103 & concret\u0103) sunt unite \u00een ritualul sufoc\u0103rii<\/em>: liturghie a experien\u0163ei limit\u0103, a experien\u0163ei ultime, o alt\u0103 form\u0103 a dependen\u0163ei de absolut (\u201cSalvezi oameni l\u0103s\u00e2ndu-i s\u0103 te salveze pe tine\u2026Tu e\u015fti dovada curajului lor. Dovada c\u0103 au fost eroi. M\u0103rturia succesului lor. Fac chestia asta pentru c\u0103 toat\u0103 lumea dore\u015fte s\u0103 salveze via\u0163a unui om, de fa\u0163\u0103 cu o sut\u0103 de oameni\u2026intri \u00een legenda lor personal\u0103, pe care ace\u015fti oameni o vor pre\u0163ui \u015fi o vor evoca p\u00e2n\u0103 la moarte\u2026\u201d) \/ maniera \u00een care eroul lui Palahniuk poate pl\u0103ti spitalizarea mamei sale (\u201cN-o fac doar pentru bani. Sau doar pentru adora\u0163ie. Dar nici una dintre ele nu stric\u0103\u201d), \u00eentr-o \u201cp\u0103timire\u201d \u00eenso\u0163it\u0103 \u00eens\u0103 \u00eentotdeauna de reziduurile ei ideale (ve\u015fnicie, salvare, iubire etc).<\/p>\n

\nVezi \u015fi: \u00eendumnezeire (\u201cunul dintre ace\u015ftia o s\u0103 m\u0103 venereze c\u00e2t timp va tr\u0103i\u201d).<\/p>\n

\nAsist\u0103m la pierderea progresiv\u0103 a identit\u0103<\/em>\u0163<\/em>ii<\/em> \u00eentr-o lume de tip simulacru (\u201cIn acest moment via\u0163a mea \u00eencepe s\u0103 arate de parc\u0103 a\u015f juca \u00eentr-un serial v\u0103zut de oamenii dintr-un serial v\u0103zut de oamenii dintr-un serial v\u0103zut mai \u015ftiu eu unde de unii pe bune\u201d):<\/p>\n

\n1)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00een rela\u0163ia cu mama \u2013 \u201cC\u00e2nd m\u0103 duc \u00een vizit\u0103 la maic\u0103-mea, nici m\u0103car nu mai pretind c-a\u015f fi eu\u201d;
\n2)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00een rela\u0163ia cu sine \u2013 \u201cnici m\u0103car eu nu pretind c\u0103 m-a\u015f cunoa\u015fte foarte bine\u201d;
\n3)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00een rela\u0163ia cu cei ce \u00eel salveaz\u0103 \u00een restaurante \u2013 \u201cCa \u015fi cum ai deveni fiul lui\u201d;
\n4)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00een rela\u0163ia cu pacien\u0163ii din spitalul \u00een care este internat\u0103 \u015fi mama sa \u2013 \u201cAici pot fi tot ceea ce aceste femei \u00ee\u015fi doresc s\u0103 fiu\u2026La to\u0163i le spun, sunt sclavul vostru. L\u0103sa\u0163i-m\u0103 s\u0103-mi pun fundul la b\u0103taie \u00een orgia voastr\u0103 de acuze. Inghit tot. Si dup\u0103 ce fiecare s-a de\u015fertat \u00een capul meu, sunt to\u0163i numai un z\u00e2mbet \u015fi-ncep s\u0103 zumz\u0103ie. R\u00e2d cu capul dat pe spate, \u00eenc\u0103 str\u00e2n\u015fi \u00een jurul meu, str\u00e2ng\u00e2ndu-mi m\u00e2na \u015fi spun\u00e2ndu-mi s\u0103 fiu lini\u015ftit, c\u0103-s iertat\u201d;
\n5)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00een rela\u0163iile sexuale \u2013 \u201cf\u0103r\u0103 haine puteau fi oricine\u201d;
\n6)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u201cservitor irlandez angajat cu contract de ucenic\u201d \u00een Parcul Colonial Dunsboro, ce pentru 6 dolari pe or\u0103 \u00ee\u015fi joac\u0103 rolul la perfec\u0163ie;
\n7)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 pentru c\u0103 \u201cnimic nu se compar\u0103 cu ceea ce-\u0163i poti imagina\u201d, \u00eentr-un spa\u0163iu fantasmatic \u00een care nu e\u015fti niciodat\u0103 dezam\u0103git, prin care evi\u0163i blocajele din realitate, ordon\u00e2nd-o, tras\u00e2ndu-i un sens.<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n
\u201cCe NU ar face Isus?\u201d<\/strong><\/td>\n\u201cs\u0103 fac\u2026\u00een loc s\u0103 m\u0103 ab\u0163<\/strong>in\u2026\u201d<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 forma de revolt\u0103, calea negativ\u0103<\/em> prin intermediul c\u0103reia Victor argumenteaz\u0103 faptul c\u0103 este \u201com adev\u0103rat\u201d, nu \u201cDumnezeu adev\u0103rat\u201d;<\/p>\n

\n–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 regul\u00e2nd, pre\u0163 de nu \u015ftiu c\u00e2t\u0103 vreme, nu-\u0163i mai pas\u0103 de nimic (note de plat\u0103, slujb\u0103, prieteni etc), nu mai sim\u0163i nimic \u015fi, de\u015fi sub o alt\u0103 form\u0103 dec\u00e2t cea schi\u0163at\u0103 \u00een Fight Club<\/em>, aneantizarea \u00ee\u0163i este iar\u0103\u015fi aproape (\u201cMagia sexului e c\u0103-\u0163i permite s\u0103 ai f\u0103r\u0103 s\u0103 posezi\u2026\u201d\/\u201d\u2026oameni care-\u015fi doresc nu at\u00e2t un orgasm, c\u00e2t s\u0103 uite\u2026\u201d);<\/p>\n

\n–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u201cDup\u0103 ce afli toate chestiile nasoale care \u0163i se pot \u00eent\u00e2mpla, nu-\u0163i mai tr\u0103ie\u015fti via\u0163a, ci a\u015ftep\u0163i. Cancerul. Nebunia\u201d;<\/p>\n

\n–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 pentru a putea rezista frumuse\u0163ii trebuie s\u0103 te g\u00e2nde\u015fti la accidente, gropi comune, m\u00e2ncare stricat\u0103, la gangrene ulcerate \u015fi organe expirate (\u201cA\u015fa de frumoas\u0103 e\u201d);<\/p>\n

\n–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 chiar dac\u0103 lucrurile \u00eencep adesea ca o fars\u0103, artificial, pe parcurs e\u015fti prins \u00een propriul joc, pentru c\u0103 dincolo de subiect, dincolo de \u201cchip\u201d, se afl\u0103 vidul, nimicnicia. Acesta este \u201cgolul\u201d pe care \u00eel umplem cu fanteziile noastre (Slavoj Zizek, The Pervert\u2019s Guide to Cinema<\/em>).<\/td>\n

\n

–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 c\u0103utare a pozitivit\u0103\u0163<\/em>ii<\/em> ca alternativ\u0103 la ceea ce a fost caracterizat drept deconstruc\u0163ie social\u0103 \u015fi anarhie ca instrumente ale revel\u0103rii personale, teme favorite \u00een romanele lui Palahniuk (Kevin Devine);<\/p>\n

\n–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 omul nu se mai afl\u0103 \u00een c\u0103utarea Obiectului ce odat\u0103 g\u0103sit \u00eel salveaz\u0103, ci \u00een c\u0103utarea accept\u0103rii de sine, f\u0103r\u0103 a se mai pierde pe diferitele paliere ale fic\u0163ionaliz\u0103rii \u00een care se las\u0103 prins \u201canimalul social\u201d;<\/p>\n

\n–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u201c\u2026\u00eencrederea. Curajul. Lipsa complet\u0103 de inhibi\u0163ii. Senza\u0163ia de confort \u015fi onestitatea netrucat\u0103. T\u0103ria de-a crede ceea ce faci \u015fi de-a spune lumii \u00eentregi Da, oameni buni, \u0103sta-i felul \u00een care am ales s\u0103-mi petrec o dup\u0103-amiaz\u0103 liber\u0103. Poz\u00e2nd al\u0103turi de o maimu<\/em>\u0163<\/em>\u0103 care-mi v\u00e2r\u0103 castane \u00een cur\u201d;<\/em><\/p>\n

\n–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 un soi de \u201c\u00eentoarcere \u00een trup\u201d (\u201cni\u015fte trupuri frumoase, rupte de realitate \u015fi lipsite de via\u0163\u0103 sau de viitor\u201d), ac\u0163iunea prin intermediul c\u0103reia renun\u0163i la a te mai supune vreunui plan prestabilit, la a mai deconstrui orice fantasm\u0103, la a mai urm\u0103ri un scop precis, ac\u0163iunea prin care te pi\u015fi pe ele de vise;<\/p>\n

\n–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 este vorba \u00een fapt despre ceea ce Slavoj Zizek numea concept ontologic al realit\u0103<\/em>\u0163<\/em>ii neterminate<\/em>, \u00een care important este procesul<\/em> de construc\u0163ie, nu des\u0103v\u00e2r<\/em>\u015f<\/em>irea<\/em> lui.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\n\u201cNu exist\u0103 suflet. Nu exist\u0103 Dumnezeu. Nu exist\u0103 dec\u00e2t decizii \u015fi boli \u015fi moarte\u201d. Singura manier\u0103 \u00een care Fiul se poate elibera din lumea de simboluri, din lumea avantajelor aparente pe care le au b\u0103rba\u0163ii, o constituie sufocarea<\/em> Mamei (motivul pentru care Victor nu \u00ee\u015fi las\u0103 mama s\u0103 moar\u0103, dar nu o dorea nici vindecat\u0103, constituie unul dintre multiplele chipuri pe care le poart\u0103 func\u0163ional dependen\u0163a \u00een romanul lui Palahniuk, dorin\u0163a de a avea pe cineva care s\u0103 depind\u0103 de tine \u00eentre\u0163in\u00e2ndu-i damblageala), maternitatea constituind substitutul divinit\u0103\u0163ii \u00eentr-o lume f\u0103r\u0103 Dumnezeu, cea din urm\u0103 redut\u0103 a sacralit\u0103\u0163ii, ultimul miracol magic absolut la care b\u0103rba\u0163ii nu au acces. Sufocarea Mamei\/uciderea lui Dumnezeu, constituie alfa \u015fi omega, \u00eenceputul \u015fi sf\u00e2r\u015fitul procesului eliberator, al vindec\u0103rii de nevoia unui cel\u0103lalt, \u201ccare s\u0103-mi \u00eenghit\u0103 tot timpul liber, tot ego-ul, toat\u0103 aten\u0163ia. Cineva care s\u0103 fie dependent de mine. O dependen\u0163\u0103 reciproc\u0103\u201d.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

de Marius-Iulian Stancu (ca prin oglind\u0103) Dac\u0103 \u00een Fight Club absen\u0163a Tat\u0103lui constituie fundamentul pentru apari\u0163ia \u201cgeam\u0103nului\u201d fantasmatic \u2013 Tyler, construc\u0163ie paranoic\u0103 menit\u0103 s\u0103 mascheze distrugerea universului simbolic, \u00een Sufocare absen\u0163a figurii paterne d\u0103 na\u015ftere fic\u0163iunii supreme \u2013 fic\u0163iunea Fiului (\u201cBinecuv\u00e2ntata \u015fi perfecta \u00eentruchipare muritoare a Domnului\u201d). Inc\u0103 din primul capitol al romanului lui Palahniuk, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[48,615,27],"tags":[30,1150,1117,60],"class_list":["post-5390","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ca-prin-oglind","category-egophobia-28","category-filosofie","tag-ca-prin-oglinda","tag-egophobia-28","tag-filosofie","tag-marius-iulian-stancu"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6DakB-1oW","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5390","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5390"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5390\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5395,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5390\/revisions\/5395"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5390"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5390"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5390"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}