{"id":6795,"date":"2011-05-16T21:36:38","date_gmt":"2011-05-16T19:36:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/egophobia.ro\/?p=6795"},"modified":"2011-05-20T20:02:53","modified_gmt":"2011-05-20T18:02:53","slug":"trei-tendinte-in-postmodernitate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/?p=6795","title":{"rendered":"Trei tendin\u0163e \u00een Postmodernitate"},"content":{"rendered":"

(postmodernitate versus postmodernism [XXV])<\/font><\/p>\n

de Gorun Manolescu<\/p>\n

Este cazul, acum,s\u0103 \u00eencerc\u0103m a ne desp\u0103r\u0163i de\u00a0 Postmodernism, dar nu \u015fi de Postmodernitate.\u00a0 \u015ei s\u0103 creionez unele ipoteze care pot fi discutabile ca orice \u201eipotez\u0103\u201d de altfel. Pun\u00e2nd cap\u0103t acestui \u015fir (lung) de eseuri, mul\u0163umind revistei EgoPHobia care le-a g\u0103zduit.<\/p>\n

\nDe pild\u0103 cred c\u0103 nu se poate pune semnul egal \u00eentre postmodernitate\u00a0\u00a0 \u015fi postmodernism. Tot a\u015fa cum nu se poate identifica modernitatea cu modernismul iluminist. Modernism care, ca paradigm\u0103 majoritar\u0103, a dominat, \u00eentr-un fel, perioada modern\u0103. \u00cen paralel cu alte asemenea paradigme (minoritare) ap\u0103rute, mai ales, \u00een art\u0103\u00a0;\u00a0 \u00eencep\u00e2nd cu romantismul (uneori \u00eent\u00e2rziat) \u015fi continu\u00e2nd cu tot soiul de, mai mult sau mai pu\u0163in \u201eexperimentalisme\u201d, cum sunt azi etichetate\u00a0: impresionism, expresionism, suprarealism, dadaism \u015fi multe altele. Unele dintre acestea submin\u00e2nd paradigma \u201eoficial\u0103\u201d \u015fi preg\u0103tind subversiv, \u00een background,<\/em> trecerea\u00a0spre postmodernitate. Cu alte cuvinte mi se pare a \u00eentrez\u0103ri, \u00eenc\u0103 de pe acum, \u00een cadrul postmodernit\u0103\u0163ii \u00een care am intrat \u015fi suntem dezorienta\u0163i \u015fi alte tendin\u0163e \u00een afara postmodernismului.<\/p>\n

\nM\u0103 g\u00e2ndesc, \u00een primul r\u00e2nd, la ceea ce se poate numi New Age<\/em>. Care, av\u00e2nd o r\u0103d\u0103cin\u0103 comun\u0103 cu postmodernismul, pare a merge \u00eentr-o direc\u0163ie contrar\u0103.<\/p>\n

\n\u201eR\u0103d\u0103cina\u201d comun\u0103 postmodernismului \u015fi New Ageului pare a fi noua realitate. Dictat\u0103, a\u015fa cum am mai ar\u0103tat \u015fi o repet, de explozia infrastructurilor \u00een general: a transporturilor (aeriene \u015fi terestre) dar, mai ales a \u201emagistralelor telecomunica\u0163ionale \u201d (tv, telefonie mobil\u0103, internet). Care au ajuns s\u0103 formeze re\u0163ele \u201eglobale\u201d (fizice \u2013 transporturile; virtuale \u2013 comunica\u0163iile) \u00een plin\u0103 expansiune. Rezultatul: o interac\u0163iune dement\u0103 , contradictorie, pe toate planurile (religie, filozofie, art\u0103, societate, economie \u015fi ce-o mai fi). \u00cen \u201etimp real\u201d , adic\u0103 \u00eentr-un \u201etimp\u201d care se aproprie de \u201einstantaneitate\u201d. Instantaneitate \u00een cadrul c\u0103reia viitorul este absorbit \u00een acest \u201etimpul real\u201d; trecutul nu mai are timp s\u0103 mai fi avut loc ; prezentul a devenit un fel de prezent continuu care se \u201eschimb\u0103\u201d mereu fulger\u0103tor . Interac\u0163iune c\u0103reia nu i te po\u0163i sustrage prin \u201edeta\u015fare\u201d. \u015ei \u00een care o serie de \u201etabu-uri\u201d \u0163inute sub obroc prin tot soiul de cutume, mai mult sau mai pu\u0163in s\u0103 le zic \u201emorale\u201d, ale diverselor comunit\u0103\u0163i, de asemenea, mai mult sau mai pu\u0163in \u00eenchise p\u00e2n\u0103 acum, dau dintr-o dat\u0103 \u00een clocot \u015fi fac s\u0103 sar\u0103 \u00een aer orice fr\u00e2n\u0103. Astfel, par a nu mai exist\u0103 dec\u00e2t doar dou\u0103 posibilit\u0103\u0163i: fie, \u00een final, o dispari\u0163ie gen sinucidere (con\u015ftient\u0103 sau nu) , fie luarea unor decizii la fel de fulger\u0103toare ca \u015fi schimb\u0103rile \u201e\u00een timp real\u201d ale zisei re\u0163ele. Prin care s\u0103 \u00eencerci s\u0103 supravie\u0163uie\u015fti \u2026.\u00eentr-o ve\u015fnic\u0103 schimbare (ceea ce, evident, este o contradic\u0163ie \u00een termeni). \u015ei asta se reflect\u0103, destul de bine, \u00een ceea ce Lyotard nume\u015fte \u201eCondi\u0163ia postmodern\u0103\u201d iar eu o numesc \u201epostmodernist\u0103\u201d.<\/p>\n

\n\u015ei acum, ce face postmodernismul? Devine, pur \u015fi simplu, o \u201eciclare\u201d negativ-ironic\u0103 \u00een jurul \u201egolului\u201d (cite\u015fte \u201enimicului\u201d) sub care nu se mai ascunde chiar NIMIC – \u201eDe ce (nu) exist\u0103 NIMIC mai cur\u00e2nd dec\u00e2t ceva?\u201d. Complet diferit\u0103 de o \u201espiralare\u201d ascensional\u0103.<\/p>\n

\n\u015ei ce face New Age-ul? Nu accept\u0103 o astfel de supravie\u0163uire prin supunere la ceea ce se poate numi \u201eimpredictibilitate\u201d. Ci caut\u0103 s\u0103 o \u201est\u0103p\u00e2neasc\u0103\u201d. Iar un fel de contradic\u0163ie \u00een termeni \u2013 dar, pentru cei ce sunt atra\u015fi de tendin\u0163a men\u0163ionat\u0103, este (sau li se pare a fi) numai aparent\u0103. Pentru c\u0103 recurg la o astfel de \u201est\u0103p\u00e2nire\u201d prin tot soiul de metode \u015fi tehnici \u201emagice\u201d\/ \u201e\u015famanice\u201d\/ \u201eexoteric- oculte\u201d, sincretice, culese din diferite contexte culturale la care acum, prin \u201edeschiderea\u201d lor, se are acces; metode \u015fi tehnici care, \u00een trecut, r\u0103m\u00e2neau mai mult sau mai pu\u0163in \u00een umbr\u0103 \u015fi izbucneau doar \u00een unele perioade de criz\u0103 (crize a c\u0103ror intensitate nu se poate compara cu cea actual\u0103 \u2013 vorbesc nu numai de cea economica ci, mai ales, de cea de pe planul culturii); urm\u00e2nd ca imediat s\u0103 fie jugulate c\u00e2nd se restabilea \u201eechilibrului\u201d.<\/p>\n

\nMai poate exista \u015fi o a treia cale (ie\u015fire befefic\u0103)?<\/p>\n

\nMi se pare c\u0103 da. Este vorba de o nou\u0103 tendin\u0163\u0103. Care, p\u00e2n\u0103 acum,\u00a0 greu perceptibil\u0103,\u00a0 \u00eencepe, din ce \u00een ce mai mult, s\u0103 capete contur. \u015ei a\u015f numi-o \u201eRevenirea la Sacralitate\u201d. Dar pe alt plan, superior. \u015ei care, nu prea t\u00e2rziu, cred c\u0103 va deveni marca de baz\u0103 a postmodernit\u0103\u0163ii. Cum\u00a0 iluminismul a fost marca principal\u0103 a modernit\u0103\u0163ii.\u00a0 E greu s\u0103 b\u0103nuim, \u00een momentul de fa\u0163\u0103, cum va ar\u0103ta o asemenea ie\u015fire \u00een toat\u0103 complexitatea ei. Dar, m\u0103 \u00eencumet s\u0103 spun, c\u0103 va fi una de tip \u201eecumenic\u201d (global), comunit\u0103\u0163ile religioase p\u0103str\u00e2ndu-\u015fi identitatea. \u015ei a\u015f da drept exemplu al unui \u00eenceput Canada (pe care o vizitez destul de des \u015fi pe perioade relativ lungi). Unde multiculturalismul \u00eentr-adev\u0103r tr\u0103ie\u015fte \u015fi nu doar la nivel conceptual. Iar integrarea se realizeaz\u0103 prin reguli de civiliza\u0163ie, extrem de stricte, dar liber consim\u0163ite; favoriz\u00e2nd \u00eens\u0103 toleran\u0163a interconfesional\u0103 \u015fi chiar o penetrare osmotic\u0103 intra \u015fi infra confesional\u0103.<\/p>\n

SF\u00c2R\u015eIT<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

(postmodernitate versus postmodernism [XXV]) de Gorun Manolescu Este cazul, acum,s\u0103 \u00eencerc\u0103m a ne desp\u0103r\u0163i de\u00a0 Postmodernism, dar nu \u015fi de Postmodernitate.\u00a0 \u015ei s\u0103 creionez unele ipoteze care pot fi discutabile ca orice \u201eipotez\u0103\u201d de altfel. Pun\u00e2nd cap\u0103t acestui \u015fir (lung) de eseuri, mul\u0163umind revistei EgoPHobia care le-a g\u0103zduit.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[731,27,51],"tags":[1152,1117,28,52],"class_list":["post-6795","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-egophobia-31","category-filosofie","category-postmodernitate-vs-postmodernism","tag-egophobia-31","tag-filosofie","tag-gorun-manolescu","tag-postmodernitate-versus-postmodernism"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6DakB-1LB","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6795","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6795"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6795\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6810,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6795\/revisions\/6810"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6795"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6795"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/egophobia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6795"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}